NCERT Withdraws Class 8 Social Science Book Amid Judiciary Content Row
The National Council of Educational Research and Training has pulled its Class 8 Social Science textbook from circulation pending review after complaints about how the judiciary was portrayed in its...
The National Council of Educational Research and Training has pulled its Class 8 Social Science textbook from circulation pending review after complaints about how the judiciary was portrayed in its content, authorities confirmed on Saturday.
The decision follows sustained scrutiny from policymakers and educators over a chapter that discussed the structure and role of courts in India. Critics argued that certain sections were inadequately framed and could cause misunderstanding among students about constitutional functions.
NCERT officials said the move to withdraw the textbook was taken to ensure that classroom material meets academic and constitutional standards. They added that a revised version will be developed after consulting subject experts and stakeholders. In the interim, schools have been advised to hold teaching on related topics using approved supplementary material.
The withdrawal comes amid heightened debate over textbook review processes and curriculum governance in the school education system. Senior education administrators said that while periodic revision is part of normal academic oversight, the current controversy has underscored demands for greater transparency in how textbook content is evaluated before release.
School principals and teachers have expressed mixed reactions. Some welcomed the review process as necessary to uphold quality and accuracy, while others raised concerns about disruptions to lesson planning so close to the academic term. They urged NCERT and state education boards to issue clear guidance on alternate classroom references until a revised edition is available.
The episode adds to broader conversations on curriculum reform and the role of national bodies in shaping school education materials, as policymakers seek clearer frameworks that balance academic freedom with constitutional fidelity.



No Comment! Be the first one.